|
Post by michel on Jan 3, 2011 1:15:24 GMT 1
Pessimistik banned me because I have said some things about Turkish people that were totally inappropriate. I am sorry if that offended anyone, which it probably did, but obviously there were more people involved in this e-fight than me. It happens to be so that some Turkish players were cursing my family repeatedly. Proof for this can be found at the bottom of this post. And let's be honest, pretty much everything I say has to be seen as a joke. I think most of you will agree with me on this. I tried to reconnect with a different name and it turned out that Pessimistik had unbanned me shortly after he had banned me. I noticed some, Turkish, players were talking bad behind Michel's back. I pretented to be his friend and asked them why they were talking about him like that and if he was still banned. Awesome replied that Michel was unbanned but that he would ban him as soon as he saw him. I asked why, obviously, and as it turned out the reason was that Michel went too far. To me this is very illogical since Awesome is not even a Turk and since Pessimistik unbanned me already for these facts. When a certain admin bans a certain player and later decides to forgive and unban that player, then why would another admin be like "No, you can't unban him because he went too far. I won't allow you to forgive him."? Continuing my story. I told Awesome that I would stand up for Michel, since he was my friend, and that's when Awesome started to be agressive. He suggested to put a bet on that and we both agreed. Awesome then said: "How can you protect someone when you are muted?", followed by a mute. I know what most of you who are reading this will think: WTF? I was unmuted a while later and by now Dior and Awesome were having a little discussion as well. Awesome said something in the lines of: "If you had not said your age then I would geuss you were eleven.", to which I replied: "If you had not said your age then I would geuss you were a five year old girl craving for a big cock". Basically it boils down to the same thing, but he banned me for this. I then changed my IP a few times, but the "clever" admins noticed it was me every time. Linkan gave me a subnetban earlier this evening. I know that it would have been better to make a thread in the first place, but, at least IMO, people don't pay much attention to these threads. To make a long story short: I have been subnetbanned. Screenshots: (Note that in the second and the third screenshot my name is "fireBlast").
|
|
|
Post by linkan on Jan 3, 2011 1:29:28 GMT 1
If pessimistik decided to unban you, its his decision. And if he did that, awesome should not ban you. I don't know if awesome found you annoying, which he obviously did when I read his post in "Admin Section" about you michel.
Lets wait for awesome and pessi, I've confidence in both.
|
|
|
Post by awesome on Jan 3, 2011 11:05:24 GMT 1
Ok I just couldn't wait for you to make this topic. Yay.. Let's start with turks insulting YOU? (damn it now I feel so bad not having taken the screenshots of you're shit) After you constantly said Turks dumb, turks are retarder turks are idiots, damn I'm glad not to be a turk... Yeah they started to talk shit about you. But that's not the point. There came the map mp_shop, yet you still trash talked them, and I made a statement, continue this and Ill fuck you up, which, what is a big shame, I didn't to 1st time, pessi banned you, and I asked him why did you do it, cause I'd just mute you for the 1st time, but you would probably continue doing it, so I'd ban you 5 minutes later. But nevermind. You came back 12 minutes after that, with a nickname, now poking my ass personally, talking to me in a way that you own the server and you will protect Michel (yourself). Than I ended in a discussion with Dior. And all the admins told him that I was right, but his main deffense was shut the fuck up awesome, I'm older than you. Well a lot of admins were there, and I think they all saw that I really wasn't calm, but they still know that I did the right thing by banning your ass. But I didn't want to ban you the second time, I said in admin chat that if you come back and apologize, I wouldn't ban you. But no, you had to come, and say more shit. An you were banned once, that means that you should stay banned untill the next month. Remember that. And weird thing is, 5 seconds after pessi banned you THE ALMIGHTY DIOR (by his words) came to the server talking shit to me, bec we banned you.
Obviously you two think you own the fucking server. Thats whats getting on my nervers most. Becouse you think, that if Dior is in AT you are invincible. Or whatever. Well I would like to point out to all the admins how did Dior enter AT last time. Tyvm, and g'bye.
|
|
|
Post by undertaker on Jan 3, 2011 11:45:09 GMT 1
lol Michel, u really deserved that ban...u were very annoying, racist and spamming fp with voices. I would ban u too...
|
|
|
Post by michel on Jan 3, 2011 11:46:42 GMT 1
Just to get this straight. According to you Pessimistik banned me but should have muted me instead so you could have banned me five minutes later because I supposedly would have continued. I have to laugh at your reasoning here. But, as you said, nevermind. I came back under a different name and, excuse me, 'started poking your ass personally'? I was being very mature and polite, but you obviously overreacted when I said that I would protect Michel. According to you this was none of my business, but let's be honest, isn't this a normal action for a friend? Anyways, I am sure Linkan won't mind checking the logs to see who's story is right.
If it happens to be so that my story is the correct one, which it obviously will be, then I will receive a subnetunban, right? Because the fact that I offended some Turkish people basically has nothing to do with this anymore since Pessimistik has banned me for this already and decided to unban me later. The ban that I received later is based upon me 'poking Awesome's ass personally'. So when this is proven wrong I will be found NOT GUILTY?
PS: I might have said that I own the server, but then it probably was because you accused me of thinking that I own the server in the first place. My statement was obviously a little and innocent joke then.
PS2: I have not spammed with FP.
Linkan will verify all this when or if he checks the logs.
|
|
|
Post by undertaker on Jan 3, 2011 11:56:28 GMT 1
yes u did...mature and polite...ahaahahahahahha
|
|
|
Post by michel on Jan 3, 2011 12:08:29 GMT 1
1. Piss off if you can't say anything constructive. 2. This is a perfect example of a friend (Undertaker) helping a friend (Awesome).
|
|
|
Post by Charlie on Jan 3, 2011 12:13:28 GMT 1
This fight looks very personal? Michel no offense but you're always involved in something, and if we read your history you're known for trying to provoke admins and other players on our server, hehe. Whatever you did, just say you're sorry for it and maybe the admin who banned you will forgive you and unban, no need to write a book about it, no seriously.
;D
|
|
|
Post by diior on Jan 3, 2011 12:40:31 GMT 1
I defended Michel, because you took it very too personal! He was totally right to complain. IMO he deserves an unban, even pessi doesn't care. Yes I like Michel so what? It doesn't mean we act like almighty, again you go too far; If i were that almighty, i would have unbanned him.
|
|
|
Post by undertaker on Jan 3, 2011 12:50:37 GMT 1
i am not defending Awesome, u corssed the line...but what about defending Michel by Dior?
|
|
|
Post by michel on Jan 3, 2011 12:56:52 GMT 1
Did you even bother reading Dior's post because he clearly mentioned that he was defending me and that he did not care. And didn't I say that it was normal to defend your friends?
Linkan will judge whether or not I have gone too far when I played under the name "fireBlast", since that's what it's all about.
|
|
|
Post by ρωиɑɦ on Jan 3, 2011 13:03:58 GMT 1
Im Laughing out loud this moment. Web Nerds upset with a virtual game and virtual words. All people gets insulted if they allow to. In my opinion that ban means that pessimistik aprooves that insults and don't have arguments to defend himself.
o/
|
|
|
Post by awesome on Jan 3, 2011 13:06:20 GMT 1
No you are banned 'cause of your rasistical jokes, and than insulting an admin under another nickname. I hope this helps you.
|
|
|
Post by michel on Jan 3, 2011 13:15:46 GMT 1
You should have muted me if you thought my Turkish jokes were going too far, but you didn't nor did you mute the Turkish players who were cursing me. Pessimistik eventually banned me for this and unbanned me shortly after. And for the last time, when I connected under the name "fireBlast" I was being very polite and mature and you overreacted and abused me. Linkan will check the logs sooner or later and will confirm my story.
|
|
|
Post by awesome on Jan 3, 2011 13:27:17 GMT 1
No you are banned 'cause of your rasistical jokes, and than insulting an admin under another nickname. I hope this helps you.
|
|
|
Post by undertaker on Jan 3, 2011 13:36:42 GMT 1
MIchel, u got muted 7 times...
|
|
|
Post by greenhead on Jan 3, 2011 13:39:31 GMT 1
as far as i know :- michel u got muted like 3 time for tht turkish joke how do i know.? I was thr and u didnt even care to stop abut tht turkish thn when u got unmuted fagg
|
|
|
Post by michel on Jan 3, 2011 14:47:17 GMT 1
Pessimistik banned and unbanned me for those jokes. The end. awesome: There's no need to repeat yourself over and over again when we both know it's a lie. undertaker: Cool story? greenhead: There's no need to offend me in your post, hence the "fag". I thought a positive attitude was to be remained always? I expect a punishment.
|
|
|
Post by undertaker on Jan 3, 2011 15:07:12 GMT 1
u got muted at least 3 times...2 by awesome, once by me...and there were players who saw that so dont lie.
|
|
|
Post by Charlie on Jan 3, 2011 16:38:05 GMT 1
Ok undy, I think we get the picture about the muting already
|
|